#MARS QUADCOPTER PRO#
1/160s f2.8, ISO 200.įocusing with the DJI Mavic 3 Pro was simple and accurate most of the time. I found it particularly useful for capturing distant subjects when at times getting closer isn’t safe to do so. Having the telephoto lens brings a different perspective and opens a whole new world of photographic opportunity. The new telephoto cameras allow for 10-bit HLG and D-Log M footage capture, and with ProRes if you buy the Cine edition. RAW files have plenty of detail to push and pull in post, making editing a breeze if you don’t overexpose too heavily when shooting. In my opinion, this camera truly shines, delivering exceptional detail, impressive low-light performance, and an impressive dynamic range. The Hasselblad camera is the real showstopper with its large 4/3 sensor and support for three different 10-bit colour profiles: D-Log, D-Log M, and HLG. This combines with the 20MP Hasselblad-branded wide-angle camera and the 12MP telephoto featured on the standard Mavic 3, resulting in a three-camera array that sets the Mavic 3 Pro apart from the competition. What makes the Mavic 3 Pro appealing is its whopping 48MP medium telephoto camera, offering a focal length equivalent to around 70mm on a 'standard' sensor. Overall, the Mavic 3 Pro impresses with its robust build quality, providing a sense of durability and reliability that boosted my confidence during aerial explorations. Image: DJI/Suppliedįor this review I was using the Pro controller and found the big bright screen a delight to use - it really helps immerse you in the experience. However, without firsthand experience using the RC controller, I can't provide a direct comparison. The DJI RC Pro ($1529 AUD) offers advanced features including a brighter screen (1000 nits vs 700 nits) 32gb of onboard storage, improved internals for greater computing and graphical power and a stronger signal, while the standard DJI RC ($399 AUD), is a reliable and efficient option without extra frills. The decision between the two controllers depends on individual preferences and budget, and there's a fair difference in price between the two. Both controllers offer a user-friendly layout with two joysticks, two gimbal control wheels, and shortcut buttons for various functions.Īdditionally, they also feature two customisable buttons for personalised adjustments. The battery, although larger, still slots effortlessly and snuggly into the back, while a rubber door provides protection for the onboard USB Type-C port and MicroSD card slot.ĭJI provides two controller options for the Mavic 3 Pro - the DJI RC and the DJI RC Pro, depending on your chosen kit. That means you can expect the familiar folding and rotating arms with props at each end.
When it comes to construction, the DJI Mavic 3 Pro showcases a design that closely resembles its predecessors in the Mavic line-up.
#MARS QUADCOPTER SERIES#
However, after a series of flights with the Mavic 3 Pro in good (and not so good) conditions, I found myself questioning whether the added capabilities were truly worth the investment and increased weight (958g vs 895g) when compared to its predecessor. This does make it more versatile for both aerial photographers and videographers. However, the Mavic 3 Pro takes it up a notch by adding a medium telephoto (70mm equiv.) to the array. The Mavic 3 Pro, which I reviewed, features a unique gimbal-mounted camera system boasting a wide-angle and telephoto camera like its predecessor, the Mavic 3. The Cine is identical except in its support for Apple ProRes encoding (422 HQ, 422, and 422 LT) and the inclusion of 1TB of internal storage to handle that footage. The Mavic 3 Pro is available in two variants - the Mavic 3 Pro itself, which will set you back $3,099 in its cheapest form, and the Mavic 3 Pro Cine, which retails for around $6,900 as a combo. Where it stands out is as the first folding drone equipped with a trio of onboard cameras. The latest addition to the DJI family, the Mavic 3 Pro shares the same body as its predecessor, the Mavic 3 from 2021.
0 kommentar(er)
